top of page

Your Software Spend Is Twice What You Think. Fix It in 90 Days.

Writer: Mike Johnstone
Mike Johnstone
Jul 16
5 min read

Ask your CFO how many software tools the company pays for. You'll get a number. Now go pull the credit card statements and count for real.


The gap is usually enormous. Finance and operations leaders at manufacturers typically estimate 8 to 12 active software subscriptions. When you actually audit card statements, login logs, and expense reports, the real number is closer to 20. Sometimes higher.


That gap isn't a rounding error. It's real money leaving the building every month, and most of it is invisible until someone goes looking.


This plays out the same way at plant after plant. A scheduling tool three different supervisors each pay for separately, none of them aware the other two exist. A quality-tracking app still billing a supervisor who left eight months ago. A quoting tool the sales team adopted during a busy quarter and never cancelled once things slowed down. None of it shows up as a line item anyone questions, because each charge on its own looks small.



Why Nobody Sees This Coming


Here's how software creeps into a manufacturer's cost base. A plant manager needs a scheduling tool and puts it on a corporate card. A sales rep signs up for a trial that quietly converts to a paid plan. An engineer downloads a CAD add-on nobody in finance ever approved. None of this goes through a purchase order. None of it shows up on the vendor list IT maintains.


Recent multi-industry audit reviews put a number on this: business units now control roughly 81% of software spend, while IT directly manages just 15%. The department most likely to be accountable for a data breach or a bad renewal has the least visibility into what's actually running.


Finance sees the charges but not who's using the tool. IT sees who has access but not what's on the corporate card. Neither side has the full picture, and neither side is positioned to fix it alone.


The rise of AI-powered tools is making this worse, not better. Employees connect a new AI assistant to their email or their file storage with one click, and that connection often survives long after the employee stops using the tool, or even after they leave the company. Nobody signed a contract for it. Nobody's tracking it on a vendor list. It just sits there with access to company data.



a computer and papers in a manufacturing plant


What This Actually Costs You


Take a manufacturer spending an estimated $50,000 a month on software. If the real footprint is twice what leadership believes, roughly $10,000 to $15,000 of that is leaking out through duplicate tools and accounts nobody uses anymore. Over a year, that's $120,000 to $180,000 in avoidable expense, with no new capability behind it. Just waste.


Then there's the risk side, and it's worse than the dollar figure. Software that operations bought without IT's knowledge rarely gets locked down properly. Former employees keep active logins, sometimes with a corporate card still attached, in tools the company considers dead. Roughly 46% of the average software portfolio carries a poor security rating, and only about 1 in 5 tools sits behind a proper single sign-on. If one of those accounts gets compromised, the cleanup cost dwarfs whatever the subscription was worth. Between the breach response and the insurance premium hike that follows, unmanaged software can end up costing 2 to 3 times its sticker price.


Cost leakage and security risk usually get treated as two separate problems. They're the same problem. Every subscription nobody's tracking is both a wasted dollar and an open door.


And most of this waste renews itself automatically. A tool nobody uses doesn't cancel itself at the end of the year. It just charges the card again, quietly, for another twelve months, unless someone with the authority to cancel it actually knows it exists.




Fix Software Spend, in Four Steps


Pull every source of truth, not just one. Three months of corporate card and bank statements, cross-checked against your single sign-on log and your employee roster. Card statements alone will miss tools bought through expense reports. Login logs alone will miss anything paid on a personal card and reimbursed. You need both, or you're still guessing.


Sort what you find by type, not just by cost. Tools that do the same job as something else you already pay for. Seats assigned to people who left the company. Tools with weak security controls, meaning no single sign-on and no two-factor login. And the AI connections nobody approved, the kind that quietly attach to an inbox or a shared drive and never show up on an invoice at all. The security categories matter as much as the duplicates, even though they won't show up on a spend report. I've seen manufacturers cancel a tool purely on cost, only to realize later it was also the one storing customer pricing data behind a shared password nobody had changed in three years. Rank by risk first, and the cost savings usually follow anyway.


Price the fix before you ask for a budget. Using industry audit benchmarks as a starting point, build a conservative case at 10% to 15% savings and an aggressive case at 25% to 30%. That range becomes your business case, and it gives you a number to hold the program accountable to later.


Put one door on the building. New software requests go through one approval path, backed by a short list of already-vetted tools. Nothing gets a company card charge without going through it first. This is the step that turns a one-time cleanup into a habit, and it's the one most companies skip because it feels like more process. It isn't. It's less process than chasing down orphaned accounts every year.


If you want a starting framework for pricing out savings like this before you take it to your CFO, my Cost Reduction guide walks through the same math, built for manufacturers specifically.



What Clients See When They Do This


The manufacturers I work with typically see cost cuts of 3% or more within the first engagement, plus 5% to 10% cash flow gains inside six months. A software spend audit is one of the fastest ways to hit that first number, because the waste is sitting in plain sight once someone actually looks for it. Every dollar of duplicate software you cut goes straight to the bottom line, the same month you cut it, with zero disruption to the plant floor.


And the security upside compounds the savings. A company that consolidates onto fewer, better-governed tools isn't just spending less. It's closing the exact gaps that turn into breach headlines. That's a harder number to put on a spreadsheet, but it's real, and CFOs increasingly ask for it by name.


None of this requires new headcount or a big technology project. It requires someone pulling the statements, doing the cross-check, and following through on the cancellations. That's the whole job. Companies delay it because it sounds tedious, not because it's hard, and the ones that finally do it usually ask why they waited so long.


This is guaranteed work. If I don't deliver, you don't pay. That's true of this audit the same way it's true of everything else I do for manufacturers in the $50 million to $500 million range.



Do This Next


Start with the credit card statements. Three months, every card that touches software. Cross-reference against your login system. You'll have a real number within a week, and that number is usually the best argument you'll ever make to your own CFO.


If you'd rather have someone else run the audit, book a free 30-minute audit call, and I'll walk through what a full spend rationalization looks like for your operation.


---


Related Reading:


Is this a problem in your plant right now?

I work with mid-size manufacturers to cut costs, improve cash flow, and reduce supply chain risk - with results in 90 days and a money-back guarantee.

 

Book a free 30-minute audit and I will tell you exactly where to start.

bottom of page